If I don't finish my marking very soon, they're going to kill me. The phone calls are increasing. With the ADD, though, I just have this overwhelming sense of guilt, failure, and frustration. More about that later. Something must be done.
Anyway, I have a plan. My Sweetie is helping me do some of the grunt administrative work that's required (filling out the forms, uploading some of the files to each project directory to help check the functionality, checking for missing/incorrect project directories, etc.). While Sweetie's doing that, I'll put in a big push to finish assessing the remaining reports (22). Then, to take a break, I'll fill in the scanning sheets for all the report-related marks for each student, and then have a go for a bit at assessing the coding parts of the projects.
The coding part is cognitively easier to assess for me as it's definitely more black and white (it works/it doesn't work; it's written well/it's written poorly). It still takes time to do, though, because you have to check through all the functionality for various points and write up the notes.
With luck, proper use of my ADD medication, and SweetieSupport, I hope to get it all in tomorrow evening's post. I'll let you know how I make out.
Project marking has to be one of the banes of my existence. Right now I'm working on grading an end of course project consisting of a coding component and a report. The coding component is fairly straightforward to do. Other than perpetual shock at the things people believe is good design/coding, it's something I can do in a reasonable amount of time. The part I have trouble with is the report.
Actually, any kind of marking where you need to subjectively weigh how close an answer is to what you want is difficult for me. Perhaps it's because Ein's have two states in many things in life: Ein/Auf, Happy/Sad, Tired/Bouncy. There's not much room for shades of grey in the EinWorld.
Anyway, that leaves me with a 53 projects to finish and I'm already two weeks late and having trouble mustering any enthusiasm for it. To be fair, I already finished doing 60 for another course which also had a coding component and a project, so I am feeling a little burnt out and I do have attention deficit disorder. Nevertheless, I promised I'd be done.
As things stand, I finished 5 completely before deciding to switch to doing all the reports first. As the reports are independent of the coding component, that's feasible. I picked the reports to do first because I like them the least and I'll feel the most relieved when they're done and the rest will be easy.
Of the 48 reports to grade, I've done thirteen. Any motivation, inspiration, or encouragement welcome!
David Jonassen visited the IDEAs lab on May 11th from the University of Missouri to present a talk on "Model-Building for Conceptual Change (Cognitive Tools in Action)". While this isn't (or so I thought) related to my own research or interests in any way, we were all encouraged to attend if possible and I'm always interested in talks about learning in general. Here, belatedly, is a synopsis of my understanding of his presentation.
The key underlying principle seemed to emphasize having people fail in their problem solving attempt at some issue because then conceptual change has a change to be engaged and then students will learn. This failure need not be catastrophic; in fact, it probably should not be, I would say, or the failure would foster a strong sense of discouragement, which is not going to get a student into the "learning zone." So, how do you put students into a non-threatening environment where they can safely experiment and fail? David Jonassen's idea was to encourage them to engage in model building which demonstrates their conceptual understanding of the problem/issue at hand. When learners build models,their understanding of the problem domain is deepened because you cannot model what you do not understand. Model building also allows you, as the instructor, to view the learner's level of conceptual change as their models evolve. It is therefore possible to assess their underlying understanding without resorting to formal assessment tests. Finally, David Jonassen suggested that model building also improves critical reasoning and thinking because model building forces the model builder to examine the process and problem solving methodology.
David Jonassen researches (among other things) the use of technology in educational settings to improve understanding. More information on his approaches to problem solving are available from on the following web site page: http://tiger.coe.missouri.edu/~jonassen/PB.htm.
I think this is some interesting research, but obviously not applicable to every learning situation. Physical processes, like volcanos, weather, chemical reactions, etc. are very appropriate for model building. Or maybe I just need to change my understanding of what constitutes a model? For example, I'm teaching students how to program in JavaScript. In a way, a program is sort of like a model and we give students programming projects where they model some kind of answer to a stated problem to demonstrate their understanding of the process. Most students do not implement the solution correctly intially, so they need to refine their understanding of the problem and its solution over several iterations. Failure is forcing them into a state of conceptual change and as they repair their assumptions and their "model" code, they are learning valuable lessons about what works and the process of both developing and fixing. I guess, in fact, I've been doing this all along; I just didn't have a name for it!
From this week's Bulletin, newsletter of the University of Sussex.
A part-time DPhil student in the Informatics department has won a national Associate Lecturer Teaching Award from the Open University (OU). Michelle Hoyle started teaching in the OU's Faculty of Technology in May 2000 and delivers internet technology courses, primarily online. The award will be presented on 20 April at a ceremony in Milton Keynes and comes with £1,000 to be used for personal and/or professional development.
It's also on the front page of the Informatics web site at the university. It's my 15 minutes of fame this year. (-:
I spent part of today working on a 100-word statement that the Open University wants to put on their web site closer to the time of the award presentation ceremony. I find it ironic that, after writing two pages about myself in order to apply for the award, I have to write another 100. I find it even more ironic that I also had to suggest a sentence to put on the certificate. For the certificate, Stephen and I eventually settled on "for outstanding dedication and excellence in on-line teaching."
That still left the hundred words to be written. I reviewed my original award application material and put together the following:
Michelle focuses on Internet technology courses delivered primarily on-line. In TT280/TT281 (Design, Development, and Management/Client-Side Scripting), she provides extensive guidance through the development of supplementary course materials, in-depth FAQs, and a strong breadth of knowledge. She is a passionate communicator about technology, believing technology is sometimes only as difficult as people make it. Therefore, demonstrating a belief that students can achieve is a key to student success. In computing and technology, where women are scarce, she is a visible role model that women can succeed well in these traditionally male-dominated fields even if they have tangible weaknesses to overcome.
Once I had that out of the way, I decided I might as well go whole hog and e-mail the The Bulletin as suggested by Thufir. Not being familiar with the publication and what information they might require, I probably went overboard.
Greetings and Felicitations.
I'm a part-time D.Phil. student in the IDEAs Lab in Informatics. My supervisor suggested that I contact The Bulletin as I've just won (or will shortly be awarded) an Associate Lecturer Teaching Award for excellence in teaching at the Open University, one of two awards to be given out at the national faculty level in my faculty.
In order to win the award, I was competing against all associate lecturers in the Faculty of Technology at the Open University across the United Kingdom. While I'm not sure how many ALs that is in total, I do know that my own region has about 50-60 ALs alone in Technology. The award will be presented on the 20th of April in a ceremony at Milton Keynes and comes with a £1000 to be used for personal/professional development.
Here's a personal statement I wrote for the OU about myself with respect to the things I've done to win this award:
Michelle focuses on Internet technology courses delivered primarily on-line. In TT280/TT281 (Design, Development, and Management/Client-Side Scripting), she provides extensive guidance through the development of supplementary course materials, in-depth FAQs, and a strong breadth of knowledge. She is a passionate communicator about technology, believing technology is sometimes only as difficult as people make it. Therefore, demonstrating a belief that students can achieve is a key to student success. In computing and technology, where women are scarce, she is a visible role model that women can succeed well in these traditionally male-dominated fields even if they have tangible weaknesses to overcome.
I started at the Open University in May of 2000. During my tenure, I've taught:
M150 Feb 2004
T171 Feb 2003, Feb 2002, Feb 2001, May 2000
TT280 Oct 2002, May 2002
TT281 Oct 2003, May 2003
TU170 Feb 2002
Course Team Work TT280/TT281 Feb 2003
M150 is Data, Computing and Information
T171 is You, Your Computer, and the Net
TU170 is Learning Online: Computing with Confidence
TT280 is Web Basics: Design, Development & Management
TT281 is The Client Side of Application of Development
The award is for my efforts over the span of my OU career so far and not just the last year.
I'm not sure what else I can tell you that might be helpful or interesting. If you have any questions, please do ask. E-mail is the best way to contact me. I can provide a photo if you need one.
OK. I did get a bit unfocused and go overboard, but I find it so difficult to write positive things about myself. Whatever hapened to the adage "the Rabbi who praises himself has a congregation of one"?