<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ein2 &#187; 1ntern3t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/category/1ntern3t/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2</link>
	<description>Ein Zwei: Even More Ein!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:38:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sharing or Oversharing? The Benefits of Google+</title>
		<link>http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/2011/09/27/sharing-or-oversharing-the-benefits-of-google/</link>
		<comments>http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/2011/09/27/sharing-or-oversharing-the-benefits-of-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eingang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1ntern3t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m an early adopter of Google&#8217;s new social media service Google+. I&#8217;ve just realized that one of the advantages of Google+ is that I can write something blog-like but limit the audience for it. Intellectually, I knew that before, but it&#8217;s just really hit home because I wanted to share something but at the same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="floatleft" src="http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/files/2011/09/g-plus-icon-150x150.png" border="0" alt="Google+ icon" width="150" height="150" />I&#8217;m an early adopter of Google&#8217;s new social media service <a title="Eingang on Google+" href="https://plus.google.com/115260925285224884051/">Google+</a>. I&#8217;ve just realized that one of the advantages of Google+ is that I can  write something blog-like but limit the audience for it. Intellectually,  I knew that before, but it&#8217;s just really hit home because I wanted to  share something but at the same time I wanted to limit the audience. It  therefore shouldn&#8217;t go on my blog, because potentially anyone can see  that. Google+ is a good solution.</p>
<p>However, it does leave me  wondering how to structure this particular type of sharing. Most of my  circles were set up around my various interests or social groups. As  surprising as this may sound, for a person who seems rather open (or  maybe I misperceive myself?), I feel I&#8217;m intensely private with a very,  very small circle of people I consider friends. I&#8217;m therefore not sure  how to share this particular thing. Yes, with that small group of  people—who don&#8217;t even have a Google+ circle!—but I do want it to go a  little wider than that. There&#8217;s a line to be drawn somehow between  privacy and over-familiarity when sharing. Things to make you go, &#8220;Hmmm…&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/2011/09/27/sharing-or-oversharing-the-benefits-of-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[Tweeting on Twitter]</title>
		<link>http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/2008/04/09/tweeting-on-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/2008/04/09/tweeting-on-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 05:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eingang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1ntern3t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://einiverse.eingang.org/blogs/ein2/2008/04/09/tweeting-on-twitter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been experimenting a little (ha!) with microblogging at Twitter. Microblogging is like blogging, except extremely succinct&#8211;140 characters to be exact. They call these little updates &#8220;Tweets&#8221;. The web site allows you to submit new &#8220;Tweets&#8221; via instant messaging (Jabber), SMS, or the web. Other people can then &#8220;follow&#8221; you around as you post your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been experimenting a little (ha!) with microblogging at <a href="http://www.twitter.com/">Twitter</a>.  Microblogging is like blogging, except extremely succinct&#8211;140 characters to be exact.  They call these little updates &#8220;Tweets&#8221;.  The web site allows you to submit new &#8220;Tweets&#8221; via instant messaging (Jabber), SMS, or the web.  Other people can then &#8220;follow&#8221; you around as you post your updates throughout the day.  Some people are following thousands of people.  I&#8217;m not that ambitious.  I&#8217;m only following a small group of people, mostly people from <a href="http://www.rheingold.com/community.html">Howard Rheingold&#8217;s Brainstorms</a>.<br />
If you want to follow my adventures, my Twitter address is <a href="http://www.twitter.com/Eingang">@Eingang</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/2008/04/09/tweeting-on-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[Inbox Insanity]</title>
		<link>http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/2005/09/18/inbox-insanity/</link>
		<comments>http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/2005/09/18/inbox-insanity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 02:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eingang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1ntern3t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M1sc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://einiverse.eingang.org/blogs/ein2/2005/09/18/inbox-insanity/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although I&#8217;ve bene quite successful for years at keeping my inbox to fewer than 20 messages at any one time, I have to confess I&#8217;ve been having a lot of trouble with this, especially in the last few months. Caught up in an endless loop of going from one crisis to another, I just haven&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I&#8217;ve bene quite successful for years at keeping my inbox to fewer than 20 messages at any one time, I have to confess I&#8217;ve been having a lot of trouble with this, especially in the last few months.  Caught up in an endless loop of going from one crisis to another, I just haven&#8217;t seemed to have much time to sit down and catch my breath, never mind keep my inbox at a manageagable level and the effects are sadly showing in missed deadlines.<br />
More than once I&#8217;ve had 100+ messages pending in my inbox.  Even today, as I type, I have 64 messages waiting for me to do something with them, whether that&#8217;s &#8220;Junk&#8221; it, file it, or deal with it and file it.  Why should this be so hard, you ask?  I do receive more mail than the average person and definitely more spam than the average person as a result of holding down multiple roles (technical support, domain registrar, Ph.D. student, university lecturer, friend, technology advisor).   According to Eudora, I receive 12, 145 messages on average per month, of which  about 74% is spam.  Of that 74% that&#8217;s spam, half of that is tagged as spam automatically by <a href="http://www.spamcop.net/">SpamCop</a> and Eudora, but I&#8217;m manually junking the other half.   Hmmm!  That might explain a lot!  I&#8217;m manually junking just under 4500 messages a month!<br />
Nevertheless, I still need to reduce the amount of mail sitting in my inbox. Some of it, I notice, is mail I need to habitually do something with, like search report results from <a href="http://www.atomz.com/">Atomz</a>  For these, I&#8217;m going to write some new Eudora rules to auto-file them.  I don&#8217;t actually need to read them&#8212;I just need to be able to get at the information later, if it&#8217;s required.  Done.  That should make a small dent and I should look for others too.  Master the mail!<br />
See more progress on: <a href="http://www.43things.com/people/progress/Eingang?on=77727">keep my inbox to only 20 messages</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/2005/09/18/inbox-insanity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[Feminine Fa&#231;ades &amp; False Faces]</title>
		<link>http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/2004/02/28/feminine-faades-false-faces/</link>
		<comments>http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/2004/02/28/feminine-faades-false-faces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eingang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1ntern3t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W0m3n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[femininity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personalities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://einiverse.eingang.org/blogs/ein2/2004/02/28/feminine-faades-false-faces/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the 1950s, you were encouraged to hide your true self and be someone model perfect.   This is not the 1950s or 1960s anymore.    Now, you have a choice.  Yes, you can be anything or anyone on the Internet. Woman or man, why not choose to be you? Leave behind the false fa�ades.  Value yourself.  Be yourself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was listening to my &#8217;50 Least Played&#8217; list in <a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/" title="Apple's iTunes homepage">iTunes</a> a few weeks ago when it rotated to a Disney soundtrack song called <em>Femininity</em> from the 1963 movie <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057542/" title="Summer Magic information at the Internet Movie Database"><em>Summer Magic</em></a>.    Talk about lyrics from an age with a different set of values:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Let him do the talking<br />
Men adore good listeners<br />
Laugh, but not too loudly (Haha)<br />
If he should choose to tell a joke<br />
Be radiant, but delicate<br />
Memorize the rules of etiquette<br />
Be demure, sweet and pure<br />
Hide the real you
</p></blockquote>
<p>Can you imagine the damage done to an entire generation of young women upon being advised to &#8220;hide the real you&#8221;?    So you would have a private personality that you could maybe share with your close girl friends and a public personality on display to your husband and his male friends or colleagues.   I know I would find it very difficult, cultural expectations and conditioning or not, to go through life projecting a fa�ade so much at odds with my inner self-image, although even I admit to tailoring my self-expression somewhat for the audience at hand.   Still, spending a large portion of your life suppressing your natural self sounds like the sure road to psychotherapy and confusion, because you feel that your &#8216;true self&#8217; is not worthwhile or valued.</p>
<p><span id="more-19"></span><br />
However, with the exception of the actual advice, maybe life isn&#8217;t so much different these days, especially in our virtual world.  The famous 1993 <em>New Yorker</em> cartoon, <a href="http://www.unc.edu/depts/jomc/academics/dri/idog.html" title="Reproduction of New Yorker Internet Dog cartoon">&#8220;On the Internet, nobody knows you&#8217;re a dog&#8221;,</a> pithily captures the very heart of the false face syndrome, even at such a young stage in the growth of the Internet.  From my years of being involved in <a href="http://games.eingang.org/" title="Information page for my IRC games">Internet Relay Chat multi-player games</a>, I have had a fair bit of exposure to people and their personas on the Internet.  Based on my anecdotal evidence, I would say that most people, at least to a small degree, portray themselves differently on the Internet than in so-called &#8216;real life&#8217;.<br />
Part of the perceived difference between the real and the virtual persona is due to the time flow of the medium.  When you are text chatting with somebody, you have the opportunity to mull over your response.  Even if it&#8217;s a real-time chat, you still have that gap between thinking something, typing it, and pressing return to send it, which allows you re-think or reformulate your contributions.  This time flow gap is even larger if you are interacting with others via e-mail, mailing lists, or discussion forums.  Even if you are not consciously amending  the projection of yourself, you are at least able to ensure what you display  reflects the best that you can be, an idealized or stylized version of yourself.<br />
For example, I do most of my current teaching online to distance educatiion students at the <a href="http://www.open.ac.uk/" title="The Open University">Open University</a>.  Even though I am notorious for my short temper and impatience, my students never &#8220;see&#8221; that aspect of me.  No matter what the provocation, I can always keep my cool, precisely because there is a gap between my physical reaction and my virtual reaction.  In this particular case, I am not deceiving anybody in a harmful way; I am, in fact, improving their learning experience.<br />
What about those who do feel the need to hide their true selves, even on the Internet where they are already physically distanced from other people?  They hide their bodies.  They hide the darker sides of themselves beneath a cheerful exterior.  The truth is, most people are unhappy with who they are.  We are constantly bombarded on television and magazines, particularly women, to be pretty, to be thin, to be smart, to be witty, or to be the perfect housewife.   Although I suspect it is not to the same degree, men, too, do not escape this.  They worry about their appearance, their performance, and their very masculinity.<br />
People who are, at heart, unhappy with themselves have the opportunity to revel in the freedom of the anonymous Internet.  Your voice is too shrill?  No problem, nobody can hear you.  You&#8217;re overweight and adolescent acne still plagues you?  Again, this is the Internet, and nobody has to see you.  You can&#8217;t think of witty rejoinders until five minutes later?  Not only do you now have more time, but you can use a search engine to look for other people&#8217;s witty statements.    You have the freedom to be a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sock_puppet" title="Definition 2 is an Internet sock puppet">sock puppet</a> or a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll" title="What is an Internet troll">troll</a> or a fake femme.    While these might be fun corners of your personality to explore or to encourage, how many true emotional bonds can be built between groups of people projecting false personas?<br />
In the 1950s, you were encouraged to hide your true self and be someone model perfect.   This is not the 1950s or 1960s anymore.    Now, you have a choice.  Yes, you can be anything or anyone on the Internet. Woman or man, why not choose to be you? Leave behind the false fa�ades.  Value yourself.  Be yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://einiverse.eingang.org/ein2/2004/02/28/feminine-faades-false-faces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
